I am trying to argue that while Nietzsche rejects what I call existential guilt/shame (that is guilt/shame that comes from experiencing one’s very nature as a violation of religious or other norms/ideals) he sometimes finds ordinary guilt to be rational and/or useful. For instance in GM II 24 he seems to suggest it would be useful if we could have ordinary guilt about our unnatural inclinations, meaning something like our learned inclinations to moralistically repress our natural inclinations. Thus he calls for an attempt to “wed to bad conscience the unnatural inclinations, all those aspirations to beyond, to what is contrary to the senses, contrary to the instincts, contrary to nature, contrary to the animal”. I would appreciate other examples that suggest Nietzsche sometimes finds ordinary guilt to be rational and/or useful. Replies to firstname.lastname@example.org would be appreciated.
I associate GM II 24 closely with GM III 9. From there you could follow Nietzsche's own links to BGE 260 and Morgenröte Ss 18 & 42
But rather than suggesting ordinary guilt is 'rational and/or useful', isn't he actually suggesting in the cited passage that it would be kinda helpful if one could enlist or harness the considerable power of guilt to some ends that he considers desirable (useful) - ?
So perhaps = could be useful
Post a Comment